The General Court of the European Union has ruled in T‑589/18 Vins el Cep, SL v EUIPO. The case concerns an attempt for registration of the following EU trademark in class 33 – Alcoholic beverages (except beer).
Against this mark, an opposition was filed based on earlier marks MM, MUMM and the following combined mark, all for class 33:
The EUIPO upheld the opposition concluding that there is a risk for consumer confusion between the signs. The dominant element in the later mark was MIM, which was similar to MM and MUMM at the beginning and end of the words.
Visually and phonetically the marks at hand were similar too. Conceptually, there was no similarity because the word MUMM meant ‘courage’ in German.
The word part NATURA in the mark applied for, had secondary importance so it wasn’t able to make the difference.
Taking into account the identical goods in class 33, the Office accepted that there is a risk for consumer confusion.
The decision was upheld by the General court.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PLANET 