New fees for international trademarks for US

WIPO reports about new fees for designation of US in applications for international trademarks. They are as follow:

tab2

The new fees will come into force on 14.01.2016. More information here.

 

Adidas attacked Barcelona’s trademark in US

WIPR reports about an interesting trade mark case from US. It concerns an opposition filed by the German sportswear company Adidas against the following application for US mark by F.C. Barcelona:

large

This mark is applied for the following goods:

Class 16 – Paper; cardboard; goods made from paper, namely, boxes of paper, packing paper; goods made from cardboard, namely, boxes of cardboard, cardboard packaging; bookbinding materials; artists’ materials, namely, artists’ pens, artists’ brushes, artists’ pastels; paintbrushes; typewriters; office requisites, namely, adhesive tape dispensers, correcting fluid for type, finger-stalls, franking machines, envelope sealing machines, punches, rubber bands, staplers; printed instructional or teaching materials in the fields of sports; printing type; printed magazines, books, pamphlets, catalogs, printed prospectus, newspapers, and printed periodicals, all in the fields of sports; placards of paper or cardboard; paper labels; posters; prints; photographs; stationery; plastic bags and film for packaging; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; printing blocks

Class 25 – Shirts, tee-shirts, blouses, blousons, parkas, jackets, trousers, gloves, socks, stockings, underwear, pajamas, nightgowns, vests, cloaks, shawls, coats, scarves, jerseys, skirts, dresses, neckties, belts, suspenders, bathing suits; sportswear, namely, basketball jerseys, soccer shorts and jerseys, cloth nappies, boas for wearing around the neck, non-electric foot muffs and biretta, cloth bibs, half belts, ski gloves, skateboard gloves, riding gloves, pumps, stoles, brassieres, liveries, shirt fronts, pelisses, pelerines, slips, hosiery; caps, raincoats, anoraks; overalls; stoles; suits; chemises; footwear and headwea.

Class 28 – Games, namely, board games; toys, namely, dolls, action figures; gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, gloves for goalkeepers, hockey golf gloves, footballs, soccer balls, basketballs, basketball nets, tennis balls, nets, rackets, racket covers, racket strings, racket presses and uprights, soccer knee pads, leg pads, elbow pads and goal nets, head guards for karate; articles for hunting or fishing, namely, fishing poles, hunting blinds, hunting bows; decorations for Christmas trees; playing cards

The opposition is based on a family of earlier marks for ‘Three-stripe’ have been using by Addidas since 1952 in US.Some of them are:

According to the company the similar stripes containing in the later mark could create consumer confusion and can injure the company’s interests in the US market.

The result from this case is forthcoming and it is an exciting example for protection of figurative trademarks in practice.

WIPO Translate on the scene

wipo-logoWIPO announced the launch of its new software for translation of patent documentation called WIPO Translate, you can find access here. For the time being this translator is covering only the main and most widespread languages in the world, we hope that more will be included in the future. Apart from this, according to WIPO, this software uses artificial intelligence because of which it is much more accurate and precise.

More information here.

Brief IP news

briefs_1131.More Rigorous Patent Examination In US Than Europe And Australia? For more information here.

2. Madrid Highlights 3/2016. For more information here.

3.What is the best way to assess the potential value of a patent portfolio? For more information here.

Information from Intellectual Property Center at the UNWE. More information can be found here  

Registration of trademarks in Japan – a Guidance

japanese-flagThe Japanese Patent Office published a very useful Guidance for registration of Japanese trademarks. The good news here, for all foreign practitioners, is that the paper is translated into English which is really helpful.

More information can be found here.

Copyright, hotels and communication to the public – Advocate General’s opinion

hotel-icon-5The Advocate General of the European court M. SZPUNAR gave opinion regarding case C‑641/15 Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk GmbH  against  Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss GmbH. The case concerns the following:

Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss GmbH (‘Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss’), the defendant in the main proceedings, is a company incorporated under Austrian law. It operates inter alia a hotel in the town of Grossarl (Austria). The rooms in that hotel are furnished with television sets which enable broadcasts from a variety of television broadcasters to be received by means of a communal aerial belonging to the hotel.

Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk GmbH (‘Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk’), the applicant in the main proceedings, is a collecting society for the management of copyright and related rights. It manages inter alia the rights of many national and foreign television organisations, including broadcasters, whose broadcasts can be received in the rooms of the hotel belonging to Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss.

Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk considers that Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss, by enabling a television signal to be received in the rooms of the hotel which it operates, is communicating to the public in a place accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee — within the meaning of the provisions transposing Article 8(3) of Directive 2006/115 — the broadcasts of television broadcasters whose interests that collecting society represents. In its view, the activity of Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss, consisting in the installation of television sets in hotel rooms and providing a television signal there, is consequently subject to the exclusive right of television broadcasters. Therefore, that company must pay the appropriate fees in return for consent for that activity.

In the light of the foregoing, Verwertungsgesellschaft Rundfunk brought before the referring court an action against Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss, claiming that it should order Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss to provide information on the number of rooms in the hotel which it operates and the number of television channels which can be received in them, and also to pay damages for the communication thereof to date.

Hettegger Hotel Edelweiss disputes the validity of the claim, arguing in particular that hotel rooms are not places accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee within the meaning of the provisions transposing Article 8(3) of Directive 2006/115, and therefore communicating the broadcasts of television broadcasters in them is not subject to the exclusive right laid down in those provisions.

In those circumstances, the Handelsgericht Wien (Commercial Court, Vienna) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:

‘Is the condition of “against [payment] of an entrance fee” laid down in Article 8(3) of Directive [2006/115] satisfied where;

–  through the TV set made available in each room of a hotel, the hotel operator provides access to the signal for various television and radio channels (“hotel room TV”), and

–   for use of the room (including hotel room TV), the hotel operator charges a fee per room per night (room rate) which also includes use of the TV set and the television and radio channels to which access is thereby provided?’

The Advocate General’s opinion is:

Article 8(3) of Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property must be interpreted as meaning that the communication of a television or radio signal through television sets installed in hotel rooms does not constitute communication to the public of the broadcasts of broadcasting organisations in a place accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee within the meaning of that provision.